Alvaro Guillen Meza vs Michael Vrbensky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Jul at 07:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Guillen Meza vs M. Vrbensky

ECU
0
Win
Played
1
Win

CZE
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Meza 0 - 1 Vrbensky
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alvaro Guillen Meza winning 0 and Michael Vrbensky winning 2. The last match between Michael Vrbensky and Alvaro Guillen Meza was at the Iasi Challenger, 08-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Michael Vrbensky getting the victory 7-6(2) 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Meza | 0 |
| Vrbensky | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Iasi Challenger(07-08-25)
A. G. Meza vs M. Vrbensky H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $49,390 | Career Prize Money | $3,200 |
| 59.12% (175-121) | Career Total W/L | 59.31% (309-212) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 7 | Titles | 11 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 50.00% (2-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. G. Meza vs M. Vrbensky Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows both Vrbensky and Meza have not won any points; could this stat impact their chances of victory?
- Looking at return game statistics, neither player has won points off their opponent's serve, highlighting a potential area of struggle for both.
- How do they handle breakpoints? Neither has managed to save any breakpoints recently, possibly affecting match outcome.
- Vrbensky has been winless over the last year, while Meza has slightly more experience with one match played, yet both have failed to win any encounter.
- Vrbensky fairs best on hard courts, but still records a 0% success rate; Meza's strength lies on clay with a 50% win ratio, although her performance on hard is also negligible.
- Meza has faced opponents with an average ranking of 364, it implies a level of competition.
- Even if the match goes to a deciding set, both players have not secured a win, reducing the likelihood of a nail-biting finish.
- Neither competitor has recently converted breakpoints, indicating an area where both could improve.
Editorial Prediction (July 8, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the available statistics, Vrbensky and Meza have faced significant challenges in converting their gameplay into success, particularly in second serve and break point scenarios. Their recent track record indicates an ongoing struggle in foundational areas of tennis performance.
Although Vrbensky shows a preference for hard courts, his results have been underwhelming. In contrast, Meza shows a potential edge on clay surfaces, though her hard court results mirror those of Vrbensky.
While Meza has played against players with a defined rank, suggesting some exposure to competition, both players' past inability to secure victories leaves much to be desired.
Overall, Meza might hold a slight advantage due to her experience against ranked competition and a marginally successful performance on clay, but the outcome remains uncertain given both players' lack of recent match wins. Based on the provided facts, Meza is slightly more likely to secure a win in their upcoming match, but it remains a closely contested affair.
Alvaro Guillen Meza vs Michael Vrbensky Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. G. Meza vs M. Vrbensky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:25:48 | Average Match Time | 1:25:48 |
| 80% (37/46) | 1st Serve % | 69% (35/51) |
| 57% (21/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (27/35) |
| 44% (4/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (9/16) |
| 33% (1/3) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 29% (15/51) | Return Points Win % | 46% (21/46) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. G. Meza Recent Matches Played
M. Vrbensky Recent Matches Played

A. G. Meza vs M. Vrbensky Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.12% (175/121) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.31% (309/212) |
| 57.93% (398/289) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.14% (680/510) |
| 53.34% (3392/2967) | Games Win/Loss | 52.51% (5933/5365) |
| 30.77% (4/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.45% (35/27) |
| 60.85% (171/110) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.37% (224/141) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.19% (50/44) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 292 | Aces Total | 1701 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 880 | Total Double Faults | 1724 |
| 1:44:43 | Average Match Time | 1:41:9 |
| 237.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 497.16 |
| 70% (12931/18493) | 1st Serve % | 56% (19457/35052) |
| 63% (8140/12931) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (13500/19457) |
| 48% (2670/5562) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7764/15594) |
| 46% (1040/2267) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1586/3549) |
| 44% (8280/18795) | Return Points Win % | 41% (14306/34824) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 52.99% (71/63) | Challenger W/L | 47.18% (92/103) |
| 65.77% (98/51) | Futures W/L | 66.77% (215/107) |
| 59% (173/293) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (300/507) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (41/79) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (84/149) |
| 49% (47/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (89/158) |
| 85% (177/150) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (309/268) |
| 15% (177/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (309/41) |
| 21% (119/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (212/40) |